consumersearch.com
For years, now, women have been losing jobs after daring to express the view that biology is real and crucial.

Companies and public bodies, captured by the needs of extremist trans activists, have exacted harsh penalties on those revealing perfectly mainstream - and legal - views on sex and gender.
reference.com
Inevitably, tribunals have followed a number of these cases. During these, we have actually heard horrifying information of females dealt with abominably by employers in thrall to campaigners who prompted and implemented the unlawful adoption of self-ID policies when it concerned single-sex spaces.

We've heard of females bullied and avoided for questioning the right of those born male to self-identify into females's spaces, from changing rooms to domestic violence refuges.

Equally inevitably, those females capable of fighting back have been winning legal actions.

But even a rock strong case does not make it simple to strike back. Good lawyers are costly and the procedure is draining, both physically and emotionally.

For each lady who has actually thrived in court, there are lots of more for whom introducing a legal case seemed impossible.

The establishment by the novelist and benefactor JK Rowling of a fund to support females's legal protection of their rights instantly gets rid of any financial barriers to action for those with practical cases.

Author JK Rowling has established a fund to support women's legal defense of their rights

The intervention of Ms Rowling should, right now, be focusing minds in personnels departments across the nation.

Since the Supreme Court ruled, last month, that sex, in law, referred biology rather than documents, a number of organisations - in both the public and private sectors - have released statements revealing their decisions to "think about" the ramifications for their policies.

This widespread and negligent complacency stands to cost business - and taxpayer-funded bodies - dear. The realities are basic. If a service is provided on a single sex basis that means biological sex, not individuality.

The law is the law and no further consideration is required in order for companies to fulfill their obligations under it.

A number of past legal actions after women were unfairly dismissed or bullied out of jobs for refusing to concur with the mantra "trans females are women" were possible thanks to the support of online crowd-funding campaigns. Ms Rowling frequently promoted - and donated to - such fundraising events.

Now, she's a one-woman crowd-funder, prepared to back the cases of every lady wronged at work for speaking the fact about sex.

The JK Rowling Women's Fund will transform the battlefield when it comes to females victimized for their genuine, reality-based views.

At the heart of industrial tribunals there might be susceptible people playing for high stakes but the human expense means absolutely nothing to the insurance companies underwriting companies' costs. For them, it's everything about the bottom line and the possibility that every woman with a case now has access to the very best lawyers in the company will, I think, encourage lots of to urge settlement rather than the embarrassment, and unavoidable expense, of more doomed defences.

If one required proof that ladies's rights are in requirement of the fiercest security, it can be found in the response to the launch of Ms Rowling's fund.

With delicious pathos, one activist lawyer declared online that the Harry Potter developer had "emerged from the shadows" as the funder of what he described as the "anti feminist biology is fate motion".

Ms Rowling has never remained in the shadows when it pertains to her views on ladies's rights, has she?

Other actions were, naturally, more violent in tone.

The ongoing tribunal involving nurse Sandie Peggie, claiming discrimination and harassment against NHS Fife and trans-identifying medical professional Beth Upton, brought the concern of the method so called "gender critical" ladies had been dealt with at work to wide attention. This is a case that "cut through" with the public and forced some politicians to deal with a concern they chose to prevent.

Scottish Labour's leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy, Jackie Baillie, announced their support for Ms Peggie and declared their belief in the value of biological sex.

If they 'd understood what they understand now, they included, they would not have voted in favour of the SNP's ultimately doomed plan to enable anyone to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their picking.

But while the Peggie case and the subsequent ruling on the legal significance of sex by the Supreme Court may have required a humiliating U-turn by the Labour management on the matter of biological reality, others stay stubbornly devoted to defiance of the law.

Naturally, the Scottish Greens - a great Wodehousian satire of a revolutionary cell - stay committed to using single-sex spaces by anyone who feels they belong to that sex.

There have been recent declarations of resistance from trade unions, too. Unison has actually allowed a trans female to run for a women-only position on its nationwide executive council.

But every act of performative defiance by well-funded trade unions - or taxpayer-funded local authorities and health boards - is another expensive legal action in the making.

It ought to not have been essential for JK Rowling to guarantee to finance the legal expenses of ladies discriminated against for their views on sex and gender. Nobody must ever have lost a task, a promo, or an agreement on the basis of their view that sex is immutable and essential.

Nor should the author have actually felt it required to establish, in 2022, Beira's Place, a women-only support service for victims of sexual violence in the Lothian area.

Ms Rowling's decisions to money Beira's Place and to finance the legal costs of females victimized for believing in the reality of sex are acts of feminist philanthropy which, in a world not made batty by gender ideology, would have been hailed by our political leaders.

I know that recognition is the last thing on the author's mind but isn't it downright unusual that, when he talks of the accomplishments of effective Scots, First Minister John Swinney never mentions the support Beira's Place has provided to numerous ladies?

Money is not the only thing females doing something about it to protect their rights need. Ask anybody who has actually been through the tribunal process and they'll inform you that the psychological assistance of friends and allies is necessary.

This comfort will not remain in brief supply for those women who get support for their cases from the JK Rowling Women's Fund. The writer becomes part of a global network of campaigners, combating to safeguard ladies's rights versus the demands of trans activists, and calls to action and assistance do not go unheeded.

Let the nation's personnels brace themselves. A most impressive plot twist has simply been composed.